First of all, this is one of the seminar where I can really
understand what the speakers actually wanted to deliver to the audience and it
is without a doubt has succeeded in keeping me and others as well to focus on
his topic.
The seminar is first started by giving the introduction to
the audience so that the audience who might have and might have none prior
knowledge in the field can understand.
Main Points and Results
The results in experiment trying to correlate the strength of
the lithosphere and the stress that act upon it, show that basically the
lithosphere is divided into 3 main mechanical zone.
1.
Shallow part of the crust
where deformation took place in brittle style and the strength is dependent on
frictional resistance
2.
Bottom part of the crust
where lithosphere has plastic style deformation and the strength is determined
by the plasticity of the mineral in the area
3.
in between the 2 layers
where brittle-ductile transition took place showing major rheological
discontinuity
Besides the layer based strength, the lithosphere is also
affected by the presence of fluid in which the lithosphere is weaker when it is
wet and stronger when it is dry.
Water, affecting or weakening the lower crust by three main
mechanism
1.
Hydrolytic weakening as
water facilitate the movement of dislocation
2.
Nucleation of new weak
phases such as mica during metamorphic or hydration reaction
3.
Facilitate grain boundary
diffusion and sliding
Earlier hypotheses that suggest the nucleation of
earthquakes in the upper mantle is proved to be not true, it has been widely
accepted that the nucleation of seismogenic record occurred in the lower crust.
It is from seismological evidence of earthquake record with magnitude higher
than 5Mw in Africa, India, China and Mongolia, peak at 15 – 40 km depth
suggesting lower crust. The common characteristic of the four locations is that
they are all have underwent dehydration as a result from partial melting and subsequence
of melt removal with geological record
of tectonic Pseudotachylite.
Emplacement of Pseudotachylite enhanced the fluid blocking
direction in metamorphism with consequence of partial transformation of
Pseudotachylite to Eclogite. The Pseudotachylite provides necessary pathway for
liquid. Shear zone and metamorphic reaction is consistently in line with large
volume of Pseudotachylite. However, even with this observation, the deformation
mechanism is still a mystery to be explored.
Investigation in other regions such as in Northern Norway
shows that there is overprint pattern of mylonitic foliation of previous Pseudotachylite
by newly formed pristine Pseudotachylite. This shows cyclical and repeating
pattern, recording history between brittle and viscous deformation.
All in all, he arrived to the conclusion that the main
deformation mechanisms are diffusion creep and viscous grain boundary sliding
in mylonitized pseudotachylite. This basically highlighting the roles of lower
crustal earthquake in providing path for fluid infiltration hence weakening the
dry granulites.
Next post: Interactions between earthquakes and a ‘critically stressed’ volcano: the 2018 eruption of Sierra Negra, Galapagos Islands
Date: 01/11/2018
Venue: LT 201
Speaker: Prof. Luca Menegon, University of Plymouth
Next post: Interactions between earthquakes and a ‘critically stressed’ volcano: the 2018 eruption of Sierra Negra, Galapagos Islands
Date: 01/11/2018
Venue: LT 201
Speaker: Prof. Luca Menegon, University of Plymouth
No comments:
Post a Comment